Itineraries revolutionary Mexico. An approach to the work of three foreign militant communists (1919-1930).
Introduction:
armed Of all the processes that Mexico has experienced one of the most important for the impact it had on the organization of the State, is undoubtedly the Revolution of 1910 that had important precedents in the strikes at Cananea and Rio Blanco, ruthlessly suppressed by the government of Porfirio Díaz. Certainly, you can not lose sight of the important role two social groups were in the armed movement, the peasants and workers demanding the vindication of their rights. Their demands and their participation encouraged the governments of Álvaro Obregón and Plutarco E. Streets were forced to grant certain benefits to these marginalized sectors of society, translating into constitutional articles that included eight-hour workday, the right to strike and demonstrate, as well as training its labor groups allegedly wrapped by a State paternalistic and protective of their rights and freedoms.
This unfortunately It was not a strategy of revolutionary governments, which were never intended to protect the most needy, but rather, control and manipulate the groups that could rise through organizations managed by central power itself and headed by leaders cromista by officials like Luis A. Morones. On the other hand also large outdoor display an alleged openness to different ideological currents that showed the image of Mexico as a paradise from which it was possible to advance in the fight for the rights of workers. This generated false expectations of foreigners who came to the country with the idea that they would be welcome and could lead out smoothly, and with government support, their struggles for rights and freedoms flying left political currents and in their home countries they were banned.
0 comments:
Post a Comment