The following web address, http://tsg.icme11.org/document/get/391
The following web address, http://tsg.icme11.org/document/get/391
was published online the article,
Font, V. & Contreras, A. (2008). The problem of the particular and Its
relation to the general in mathematics education.
Educational Studies in Mathematics . (DOI: 10.1007/s10649-008-9123-7)
that can be downloaded from the
http://www.springerlink.com/content/u8441071121170p1/
Abstract Research in the didactics of mathematics has Shown the importance of the
problem of the particular and its relation to the general in teaching and
learning mathematics as well as the complexity of factors related to them.
In particular, one of the central open questions is the nature and diversity
of objects that carry out the role of particular or general and the
diversity of paths that lead from the particular to the general. The
objective of this article is to show how the notion of semiotic function and
mathematics ontology, elaborated by the onto-semiotic approach to
mathematics knowledge, enables us to face such a problem.
On Thursday April 10, 2008 was held at the Universidad del Valle (Cali, Colombia), in the framework of the Inter-institutional Ph.D. in Education, the seminar entitled, Can ontosemiotic approach in applying the various Science Education?, conducted by JD Godino.
SUMMARY:
ontosemiotic Approach (EOS) is a theoretical framework that has emerged within the mathematics education with the purpose of expressing different points of view and theoretical notions about knowledge mathematical teaching and learning. To this end we adopt a global perspective, taking into account the various dimensions involved and the interactions between them. In particular, it proposes an epistemological model of mathematics based on anthropological assumptions / sociocultural ( Bloor, 1983; Chevallard, 1992, Radford, 2006 ), a mathematical model of cognition - on bases semiotics (Eco , 1976; Hjelmslev, 1943; Peirce, 1931-58) and an instructional model - on socio-constructivist bases ( Ernest, 1998; Brousseau, 1998 ), a systemic model - green (Morin, 1977) linking together the previous dimensions and the biological background, material and sociocultural (Maturana and Varela, 1984) in which activity takes place of study and mathematical communication.
The set of tools that make up the theoretical models mentioned, and its application to various studies have been published in several papers available on the website of the research group "Theory of Mathematics Education" of the University of Granada: http://www.ugr.es/local/jgodino . A summary of the EOS is presented in Godino, Batanero and Font (2008).
As indicated, the EOS is supported and financed by contributions from various disciplines and technologies involved in human cognition, such as epistemology, psychology, sociology, semiotics, ..., and the efforts and contributions of many researchers that address the issues of dissemination and knowledge development in educational contexts. In this conference - conference, after presenting a brief summary of the origin, objectives and components of the EOS, we aim to address the following issues:
References:
Bloor, D. (1983). Wittgenstein. A Social Theory of Knowledge . London, UK: The Macmillan Press.
Brousseau, G. (1998). teor The didactic situations . Grenoble: La Pensée Sauvage.
Chevallard, Y. (1992). Fundamental concepts in didactics: perspectives brought by a approache anthropological. Research in Mathematics Education, 12 (1), 73-112.
Eco, U. (1976). Tratado general semiotics. Barcelona: Lumen.
Ernest, P. (1998). Social constructivism as a philosophy of mathematics . New York, NY: SUNY.
Godino, JD Tanner, C. and Font, V. (2007). The onto-semiotic approach to research in mathematics education. DMZ. The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 39 (1-2), 127-135. [Expanded and updated version available online: http://www.ugr.es/local/jgodino ].
Hjelmslev, L. (1943). Prolegomena to a Theory of Language (1971). Madrid: Gredos. Maturana, H. and Varela, F. (1984). The tree of knowledge. Debate, 1996. Morin, E. (1977). The method I, the nature of nature (1986). Madrid: Cátedra. Peirce, CS 1931-1958. Collected Papers . Vols. 1-8, C. Hartshorne, P. Weiss and AW Burks (Eds.).
Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.